{"id":473,"date":"2025-10-09T04:35:28","date_gmt":"2025-10-09T04:35:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/demo.connorsheehan.us\/?p=473"},"modified":"2025-10-09T04:35:28","modified_gmt":"2025-10-09T04:35:28","slug":"am-i-paying-too-much-in-advisor-and-investment-fees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/demo.connorsheehan.us\/index.php\/2025\/10\/09\/am-i-paying-too-much-in-advisor-and-investment-fees\/","title":{"rendered":"Am I Paying Too Much in Advisor and Investment Fees?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

One of the most common responses I get from retirees is when I ask them if they know how much they\u2019re paying in fees. Their response is almost always the same:
\u201cRaman, we have no clue and we don\u2019t even know where to look for it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And that\u2019s exactly how the financial industry likes it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most retirees have no idea what they\u2019re really paying. Fees are scattered across statements, tucked inside management fees, sub-advisor fees, fund expense ratios, and sometimes buried as upfront commissions, and over time they quietly eat away at your returns. The impact is massive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Morningstar\u2019s 2024 Mind the Gap<\/em> report, the average investor loses roughly 0.7% per year to hidden costs and behavioral drag<\/strong>, and over a 20-year retirement, that adds up to hundreds of thousands of dollars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s start with the most visible cost: your advisor fee<\/strong>. The 1% Problem<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The traditional model charges about 1% of your assets every year. It sounds small until you do the math. A client I recently met here in Scottsdale<\/strong> had $3 million invested<\/strong>, paying around $30,000 every year<\/strong> to his advisor. On top of that, his portfolio was invested aggressively at nearly 90% equities, and he was getting ready to retire and live off of his investments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He wasn\u2019t paying for active tax management, retirement modeling, or estate coordination\u2014just investment management. Over 20 years, those fees would have added up to about $600,000<\/strong>, not including lost compounding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When we rebuilt his plan under a flat-fee fiduciary structure<\/strong>, the annual cost dropped to $10,000<\/strong> with a fund expense ratio of just 0.10%<\/strong>. That one shift freed up $20,000 a year<\/strong> that could instead fund travel, healthcare, or charitable giving.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another client in Tucson<\/strong> came to me after purchasing a $2 million annuity from a very reputable firm.<\/strong> The promise was \u201ctax deferral\u201d<\/em> and \u201cguaranteed income for life.\u201d<\/em> But after reviewing the contract, their contract value had doubled in 10 years, which on the surface looked great, but what I discovered was – <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not only their internal fees were close to 3% annually<\/strong>, roughly $120,000 a year<\/strong> in hidden costs, if they had invested that same money in a taxable brokerage account<\/strong>, they wouldn\u2019t be paying 30% in taxes on withdrawals<\/strong> as they are right now. Their account value would likely have been close to $6 million<\/strong>, and they would be paying long-term capital gains tax of just 15%<\/strong> instead of 30%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For that advisor, it was a quick large annuity transaction. But for this client, it changed their lives forever.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As I explain in my article Retirement Planning Without Taxes: Why It Costs So Much (and How to Fix It)<\/em><\/a>, the key to keeping more of your money is aligning your investment, tax, and income strategy together before<\/em> locking yourself into products that sound safe but aren\u2019t efficient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beyond advisor fees, there are some fees that you just can\u2019t get away from BUT you can certainly reduce those fees. Mutual funds, ETFs, and separately managed accounts (SMAs) all have built-in expense ratios that range from 0.05% to over 1.25%<\/strong>. While 1% might not seem like much, on a $2 million portfolio<\/strong>, that\u2019s $20,000 every single year<\/strong>. What\u2019s shocking is that, even 401(k) plans<\/strong> nowadays are charging as high as 1% in fund fees inside your 401(k)<\/strong>, the account most people rely on for retirement. So if you haven\u2019t reviewed your 401(k) allocation recently, do it now!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vanguard completed this study in 2024 and found out that investors who use low-cost ETFs<\/strong> versus high-fee active funds can gain up to 30% more<\/strong> in total wealth over a 25-year period. And that\u2019s exactly why benchmarking fund costs is critical for anyone nearing or in retirement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So How Do You Benchmark Your Fees?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

If you\u2019re over 55 and retired in Phoenix, Scottsdale, or Tucson<\/strong>, here\u2019s a quick way to evaluate what you\u2019re paying:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Advisor Fees:<\/strong> Add up the percentage you pay (typically 1%) and multiply it by your portfolio. Then compare that to a flat-fee fiduciary<\/strong> model which is usually between $8,000 and $15,000 per year, regardless of asset size.
    <\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Investment Costs:<\/strong> Look up your fund expense ratios. Anything over 0.50% deserves scrutiny.
    <\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Commissions:<\/strong> Check for annuities or A-share mutual funds that pay upfront commissions or C-shares with annual trail commissions. One sale and commission for life with no extra work.
    <\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. All-In Cost:<\/strong> Add everything together. A fair, comprehensive cost for planning, investment management, and tax strategy shouldn\u2019t exceed 0.50% per year<\/strong> on a $2 million portfolio.
    <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    And If you\u2019re paying more, you\u2019re not getting more\u2026.you\u2019re just paying more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    And here\u2019s what a $400,000 Difference Looks Like. <\/strong>Imagine two retirees in Scottsdale, both with $2 million.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n